2011-2012-知识产权案例精选

首页 > 图书 > 人文社科类图书/2020-06-17 / 加入收藏 / 阅读 [打印]
2011-2012-知识产权案例精选

2011-2012-知识产权案例精选

作者:吴偕林

开 本:16开

书号ISBN:9787513026048

定价:88.0

出版时间:2014-04-01

出版社:知识产权出版社

  ──岳彤宇与周立波网络域名权属纠纷案

 29.擅自将他人企业名称注册为域名应当承担相应的民事责任 246

  ──上海长途汽车客运总站有限公司与铭万信息技术有限公司等

  计算机网络域名纠纷案

五、知识产权刑事案件

 30.商标犯罪中故意售假、涉案商品真伪及销售金额的认定 253

  ──陈有志销售假冒注册商标的商品罪案

 31.侵犯著作权罪的认定 260

  ──傅旭义等人侵犯著作权罪案

 32.利用“外挂”制售网络游戏虚拟货币行为的刑事责任认定 266

  ──余刚等侵犯著作权罪案

 33.非法制造他人注册商标行为的认定及制造数量的计算规则 280

  ──上海镭友实业有限公司等非法制造注册商标标识罪案

 34.外国作品能否作为侵犯著作权罪的犯罪对象 288

  ──游海豹等侵犯著作权罪案

 35.销售侵权复制品罪的认定 293

  ──张乐等侵犯著作权罪、销售侵权复制品罪案

 36.网络环境下侵犯著作权罪的司法认定 301

  ──阎鹏侵犯著作权罪案

六、知识产权行政案件

 37.类似商品的判断标准 307

  ──浙江梅泰克诺新型建筑板材有限公司不服工商销案决定案

 38.知识产权海关行政保护措施的司法审查 320

  ──上海贝邦进出口有限公司不服海关临时扣押产品决定案

i. civil dispute cases over copyright

 1.judgment on effect and liability for breach of contract regardingthe rights to dispose future works 1

  — shanghai xuanting entertainment information technology co., ltd.v.wang zhong, et al  dispute over copyrightcontract

 2.network service provider has the duty of care to its users’repeated infringement 21

  —zhuang zedong et al v. shanghai source internet technology co.,ltd.  dispute over infringement on theright to network dissemination of information

 3.determination on ownership of copyright of cartoon characterimages 37

  -- hu jinqing, et al and shanghai animation film studio  dispute over copyright ownership

 4.determination on whether slogans constitute works 52

  -- chen yuji et al v. shanghai yuexing holding group co., ltd. etal  dispute over copyright infringement

 5.evidentiary effect of website icp filing information anddetermination 62

  -- shanghai guanshi culture communication co., ltd. v. shanghaibeiming high strength steel co., ltd., et al dispute over infringement on right to network dissemination ofinformation of works

 6.determination of infringement liability of search engine providers74

  ──shanghai xuanting entertainment information technology co., ltd. v.beijing baidu network information technology co., ltd. et al  property right infringement

 7.determination of unauthorized use of well-known trademarks inwebsites and pamphlets 78

  ── cartier international n.v. v. foshan m?k ceramics co., ltd. insanshui district et al  trademark rightinfringement and unfair competition

 8.judicial determination of nominative fair use of trademarks 86

  ——nippon paint (china) co., ltd. v. shanghai zhanjin trade co., ltd.et al  infringement on exclusive right touse trademarks

 9.judgment on trademark similarity in determination of trademarkinfringement 93

  ──beiersdorf ag v. shanghai yuyan cosmetic company et al   infringement on exclusive right to use atrademark

 10.conditions and factors for judicial recognition of well-knowntrademarks 100

  ─ diageo brands bv et al v. xiao shaolim et al  infringement on exclusive right to use atrademark

 11.judgment on the necessity of well-known trademark recognition 107

  ──intel corporation v. shenzhen inteljet digital technology co., ltd.,et al infringement on exclusive right to use a trademark

 12.“integral part” selection of combined trademarks for similaritycomparison 113

  ──nokia corporation v. wuxi jinyue technology co., ltd.  infringement on exclusive right to use atrademark

 13.judicial determination of contributory infringement by onlinetrade platform operator 118

  ──e?land fashion (shanghai) co., ltd.v. zhejiang taobao network co.,ltd. et al  infringement on exclusiveright to use trademarks

 14.effect of trademark use in the determination of trademarkinfringement 125

  ──honeywell international inc. v. shanghai gerritt turbocharger systemco., ltd. et al  infringement onexclusive right to use trademarks and unfair competition

 15.judicial determination of infringement of exclusive right to useregistered trademark by 16.network domain name 137

  ──swarovski aktiengesellschaft v. wang chenyun et al  infringement on exclusive right to usetrademark

 17.application of laws concerning rush registration of trademark bydistributors 144

  ──abbott diabetes care inc. v. shanghai hotin commercial trading co,ltd. et al  infringement on ownership ofexclusive right to use trademarks

 2/4   首页 上一页 1 2 3 4 下一页 尾页

法律 法律实务

在线阅读

  • 最新内容
  • 相关内容
  • 网友推荐
  • 图文推荐