十九世纪欧洲语言学史 内容简介

本书详尽地介绍了西方比较语言学的兴起和发展，对于近代欧洲语言科学的发展、方法和成果做了综合的叙述。介绍了欧洲古典时代、中世纪以及16，17，18世纪的语言学的演进，叙述了印欧语系各个语支以及世界各个语系的研究情形，并从碑铭与考古的发现情况对文字史进行了探讨，*后还讨论了比较语言学的方法论及其演进过程。
著名语言学家朱德熙先生称本书为“*好的一本介绍历史比较方法的书”。

十九世纪欧洲语言学史 目录

导读　
英译者序　
原书目录　
引论
　（一）无宗教的古代
　（二）基督教。中古时期
　（三）16和17世纪
　（四）18世纪
　（五）19世纪
**章 印度和伊朗古代文学语言的发展
　（一）印度语
　（二）伊朗语　
第二章近代欧洲诸大语群：日耳曼语、斯拉夫语、克尔特语
　（一）日耳曼语
　（二）斯拉夫语
　（三）克尔特语
第三章立陶宛语、阿尔巴尼亚语、阿尔明尼亚语
　（一）立陶宛语
　（二）阿尔巴尼亚语
　（三）阿尔明尼亚语
第四章古希腊拉丁语研究的继续
　（一）古典语文学
　（二）希腊语
　（三）拉丁语
第五章非印欧的诸语系的研究
　（一）欧洲四围的外系语言
　（二）印度四围非印欧系的诸语群
　（三）更远的非印欧系的诸语群
第六章 铭文和考古发现文字史的研究
　（一）楔形铭文所代表的诸语言
　（二）象形文字的领域
　（三）闪语字母
　（四）闪语字母较远的支裔
　（五）使用希腊字母的一些国家
　1．希腊古文字的发现
　2．其他民族采用的希腊字母
　（六）拉丁字母的支裔
第七章 比较语言学的方法
　（一）方法的发展概况
　（二）早期的比较语言学
　（三）比较语言学的新时期
第八章 印欧人的语言亲属关系、家乡和文化
索引
　通用索引
　词汇索引

十九世纪欧洲语言学史 节选

《十九世纪欧洲语言学史》详尽地介绍了西方比较语言学的兴起和发展，对于近代欧洲语言科学的发展、方法和成果做了综合的叙述。介绍了欧洲古典时代、中世纪以及16，17，18世纪的语言学的演进，叙述了印欧语系各个语支以及世界各个语系的研究情形，并从碑铭与考古的发现情况对文字史进行了探讨，*后还讨论了比较语言学的方法论及其演进过程。著名语言学家朱德熙先生称《十九世纪欧洲语言学史》为“*好的一本介绍历史比较方法的书”。

十九世纪欧洲语言学史 相关资料

插图：In the Introduction we have seen how the opportunities of surveying a greater and greater linguistic territory increased fromone period to the next, until, in recent times, after the resumptionof the study of Greek, the linguistic horizon of the ancients wascombined with that of the Middle Ages in one great survey. Thissurvey produced in itself the need for method, the need for aprinciple of rational classification of this vast material. In spite of its very different appearance, the linguistic science ofthe nineteenth century carries on logically from the earlierdeve opment: the butterfly bursts forth from its cocoon as the resultof the growth it has experienced within its winter shelter. The nineteenth century created the method which the previousdevelopment called for, and still further increased the materialavailable for study. This new material was not the least importantfactor in revolutionizing the whole conception of language. Theknowledge of the language.~ of ancient India was a genuinerevelation, not only because of its great age and transparentmorphology, which unexpectedly cast new light upon the relatedEuropean languages, but also because European scholars herebecame acquainted with a highly developed linguistic science whichhad other points of departure and another evolution than thelinguistic science of the Greeks. Moreover, it was distinguishsd bythe very thing so lacking in Greek linguistics m systematic, rationalanalysis of the forms of speech. But this was not the only addition toprevious knowledge. Everywhere linguistic material from older timeswas brought to light which made an historical treatment of languagepossible —— in distant Iran as well as in the regions of Europe knownin ancient times, among the Slavs, the Germans, the Celts. Thus inevery way the study of the Indo-European family of languages wasbroadened. Of this family, whose existence was first recognized atthe beginning of the century, even the least-known members weredrawn into the circle of investigation: first ithuanian, the great ageof whose forms became evident in the new light of linguisticcomparison, and attracted attention early.

 1/2    1 2 下一页 尾页

社会科学 语言文字

在线阅读