2011考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析 本书特色

《2011年考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析》：全国考研辅导班教材系列

2011考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析 内容简介

本书根据*新英语考试大纲的要求，总结了考研英语历年真题考查的知识点和常见错误，包括试题解析、选项解析、考生常见错误与防范、试题全文翻译、重点词语和长难句分析。
该书2010年版获中国书刊发行行业协会颁发的“2009年度全行业优秀畅销书”奖。考生可以通过这种较高学术性的解题方式迅速领悟考试的重点和难点，走出复习和解题的盲区。

2011考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析 目录

2011考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析 节选

《2011年考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析》内容简介：高教版2011年考研英语系列丛书，由考研英语大纲修订的专家和全国考研英语辅导团队中的精英教师编写。可满足2011年考生全过程复习备考的需要。本系列教材专门针对全国各地考研辅导班学生的特点和实际水平编写，也适合社会考生自学的需要。书中融合了考研英语辅导专家多年辅导的经验，完全切中考研英语大纲的考点。内容阐述准确、精练，重点突出。而且《2011年考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析》在编写时吸取了各届辅导班学员的意见和建议，对考生来说是一套非常权威、实用的考试参考书。

2011考研英语真题考点与常见错误透析 相关资料

插图：In his book The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell argues that "social epidemics" aredriven in large part by the actions of a tiny minority of special individuals, often called influ-entials, who are unusually informed, persuasive, or well connected. The idea is intuitivelycompelling, but it doesn't explain how ideas actually spread.The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible-sounding but largely un-tested theory called the "two-step flow of communication": Information flows from themedia to the influentials and from them to everyone else. Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it suggests that if they can just fred and influence the influentials, those se-lect people will do most of the work for them. The theory also seems to explain the suddenand unexpected popularity of certain looks, brands, or neighborhoods. In many such cases,a cursory search for causes finds that some small group of people was wearing, promoting,or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid attention. Anecdotal evidence of thiskind fits nicely with the idea that only certain special people can drive trends.In their recent work, however, some researchers have come up with the finding that in-fluentials have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed. In fact, theydon't seem to be required at all.The researchers' argument stems from a simple observation about social influence: Withthe exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey —— whose outsize presence is primarily afunction of media, not interpersonal, influence —— even the most influential members of apopulation simply don't interact with that many others. Yet it is precisely these non-celebrityinfluentials who, according to the two-step-flow theory, are supposed to drive social epidem-ics, by influencing their friends and colleagues directly. For a social epidemic to occur, how-ever, ea